DE HAVILLAND / GENERAL AVIATION

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

A wooden touring and training biplane with folding wings.

+ Compare aircraft

Choose the version you fly to narrow the edition-specific reading.

Seats2
ConstructionWood
EngineGipsy II
Wing storageFolding wings
Simulator ecosystemsMSFS
YOUR AIRCRAFT COMPANION

Start here

A few places to begin, from the aircraft’s story to the people who fly it.

Aircraft background

Aircraft and simulator background

The DH.60 Moth developed as a 1920s two-seat touring and training biplane. Its wooden construction and folding wings suited club and private ownership, allowing the aircraft to occupy less hangar space.

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

Developer · Read more ↗
Aircraft systems

A restored simulator cockpit

Flight Replicas' DH.60G has a control stick and pitch-trim lever, alongside modern radio, transponder, electrical switches and a two-axis autopilot. The Gipsy II drives a fixed-pitch propeller. Its fixed tailwheel gear has no steerable tailwheel in the manual.

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

Developer · Read more ↗
Aircraft systems

Folding wings and speed references

Wing folding is available only with the aircraft stationary. The handbook gives 85 mph cruise, 102 mph normal maximum and 125 mph dive figures, with their separate meanings retained.

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

Developer · Read more ↗
THE AIRCRAFT

Meet de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

The DH.60 Moth developed as a 1920s two-seat touring and training biplane. Its wooden construction and folding wings suited club and private ownership, allowing the aircraft to occupy less hangar space.

Flight Replicas represents a restored DH.60G with a Gipsy II engine, radio, transponder and two-axis autopilot. Those modernised cockpit features sit alongside a control stick and pitch-trim lever.

FAMILY, MODELS & VARIANTS

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

de Havilland → · Explore the family →

Aircraft type designators

No type designator selected for this reference.

HOW IT CAME TO BE

History & design

Clubs, private flying and long journeys

The Gipsy Moth became associated with flying clubs and private owners. The developer's history also recalls long-distance flights: Amy Johnson used one for her 1930 journey to Australia, while Francis Chichester and Jean Batten flew Gipsy Moths on other intercontinental journeys. The DH.60 was also produced outside Britain.

Developer · de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer reference ↗

DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures

UNDER THE SKIN

Systems & details

A restored simulator cockpit

Flight Replicas' DH.60G has a control stick and pitch-trim lever, alongside modern radio, transponder, electrical switches and a two-axis autopilot. The Gipsy II drives a fixed-pitch propeller. Its fixed tailwheel gear has no steerable tailwheel in the manual.

DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures
Developer · de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer reference ↗

Folding wings and speed references

Wing folding is available only with the aircraft stationary. The handbook gives 85 mph cruise, 102 mph normal maximum and 125 mph dive figures, with their separate meanings retained.

DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures
Developer · de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer reference ↗
VIRTUAL VERSIONS

In your simulator

Systems, equipment and documentation for each developer’s aircraft.

MSFS 2020 · MSFS 2024

Flight Replicas DH.60G Gipsy Moth

Flight Replicas · Released

MSFS 2020 · MSFS 2024Third-party add-on

Aircraft

A restored simulator cockpit

Flight Replicas' DH.60G has a control stick and pitch-trim lever, alongside modern radio, transponder, electrical switches and a two-axis autopilot. The Gipsy II drives a fixed-pitch propeller. Its fixed tailwheel gear has no steerable tailwheel in the manual.

Developer · de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer reference ↗

DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures

Folding wings and speed references

Wing folding is available only with the aircraft stationary. The handbook gives 85 mph cruise, 102 mph normal maximum and 125 mph dive figures, with their separate meanings retained.

Developer · de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer reference ↗

DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures

GO TO THE SOURCE

Manuals & resources

Find your next read

Choose a topic for a short introduction and a link to the original source. Simulator references identify the developer and edition they cover.

Developer documentation

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer referencede Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

Aircraft features and simulator package description

Developer · Read the source ↗
de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer referencede Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

MSFS collection, distinct from legacy hangar

Developer · Read the source ↗

Developer manual

de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer referencede Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth

DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures

Developer · Read the source ↗

Read the original documentation from the people who created it. Manuals open on their publisher’s website.

Developer documentation

↗de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer referenceDeveloper · Aircraft features and simulator package description ↗de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer referenceDeveloper · MSFS collection, distinct from legacy hangar

Developer manual

↗de Havilland DH.60G Gipsy Moth — developer referenceDeveloper · DH.60G manual; PDF p.2 History; pp.3–4 Controls and Autopilot; p.11 handbook figures
AIRCRAFT AND FEEL

Built-in force-feedback profiles

Read the documentary basis, editable starting settings and remaining questions for the aircraft you fly. Each explanation refers to the exact profile revision shown.

Catalogue programme-20261011-v3 · 2 profile choices

Explore all built-in profile references →

Content expanded · What’s new

Something missing or a source that needs attention?

Suggest a correction ↗