WRIGHT CYCLE COMPANY / HISTORICAL AIRCRAFT

Wright Flyer

The Wright brothers’ early powered aircraft, with a forward elevator and a biplane wing.

+ Compare aircraft
Simulator ecosystemsMSFS
YOUR AIRCRAFT COMPANION

Start here

A few places to begin, from the aircraft’s story to the people who fly it.

Aircraft background

Meet the aircraft

The Wright brothers’ early powered aircraft, with a forward elevator and a biplane wing. Microsoft lists Wright Flyer in the Standard tier. Aviator includes the lower edition tiers. The simulator edition is recorded separately from the real aircraft’s development or certification status.

Wright Flyer

Microsoft · Read more ↗
THE AIRCRAFT

Meet Wright Flyer

The Wright brothers’ early powered aircraft, with a forward elevator and a biplane wing.

Microsoft lists Wright Flyer in the Standard tier. Aviator includes the lower edition tiers. The simulator edition is recorded separately from the real aircraft’s development or certification status.

Research-based aircraft backgroundMicrosoft · MSFS 2024 official aircraft roster ↗
FAMILY, MODELS & VARIANTS

Wright Flyer

Wright Cycle Company → · Explore the family →

Aircraft type designators

No type code selected for this entry yet.

VIRTUAL VERSIONS

In your simulator

Systems, equipment and documentation for each developer’s aircraft.

Compare simulator versions →
MSFS 2024

Wright Flyer

Microsoft Flight Simulator · Released

MSFS 2024Included / first-party

Aircraft

Edition / package Standard

MSFS 2020

Wright Flyer

Microsoft Flight Simulator · Released

MSFS 2020Included / first-party

Aircraft

Edition / package Standard

GO TO THE SOURCE

Manuals & resources

Read the original documentation from the people who created it. Manuals open on their publisher’s website.

Resource

MSFS 2024 official aircraft rosterMicrosoft · Official catalogue reviewed 15 September 2026 MSFS 2020 official aircraft rosterMicrosoft · Official catalogue reviewed 15 September 2026

Content expanded · What’s new

Something missing or a source that needs attention?

Suggest a correction ↗