Start here
A few places to begin, from the aircraft’s story to the people who fly it.
Meet the aircraft
The modern A50 Junior revives the open tandem cockpits and corrugated-metal appearance of the 1929 Junkers design. It uses a Rotax 912iS engine and contemporary equipment. The developer's background records European ultralight approval in 2022, followed by US light sport approval.
Aircraft background
VSKYLABS · Read more ↗The modern Rotax-powered Junior
The product represents the modern Rotax-powered A50 Junior. Its G1000-based cockpit displays differ from the real aircraft’s G3X equipment, as the developer explains.
A50 Junior (modern) · VSKYLABS · X-Plane 12
VSKYLABS · Read more ↗Into the cockpit
YouTube JUNKERS AIRCRAFT · 2 min ·
Junkers Aircraft - A50 Junior, 2023
Junkers introduces its modern A50 Junior interpretation.
Modern interpretation · Junkers A50 Junior, 2023
Watch on YouTube ↗Preview images are served by AirframeDB. Videos open on YouTube only when you choose to watch.
Meet Junkers A50 Junior (modern)
The modern A50 Junior revives the open tandem cockpits and corrugated-metal appearance of the 1929 Junkers design. It uses a Rotax 912iS engine and contemporary equipment. The developer's background records European ultralight approval in 2022, followed by US light sport approval.
VSKYLABS models this modern aircraft. Its X-Plane cockpit uses G1000-based displays in both seats; the real aircraft's described installation is Garmin G3X.
Junkers A50 Junior (modern)
Junkers Aircraft (modern) → · Explore the family →
Junkers A50 Junior (modern)
VSKYLABS · VSKYLABS Aerospace Simulations Aircraft Center: VSKYLABS Junkers A50 Junior ↗A50 Junior modern production
VSKYLABS · VSKYLABS Aerospace Simulations Aircraft Center: VSKYLABS Junkers A50 Junior ↗VSKYLABS · X-Plane 12 →Aircraft type designators
A model-specific ICAO or FAA designator has not been confirmed in the references reviewed for this aircraft.
History & design
The original Junior
The original A50 Junior first flew in 1929. Its corrugated duralumin skin and open tandem seating gave a small sport aircraft the recognisable Junkers appearance. The manufacturer’s history recalls Marga von Etzdorf’s staged flight from Berlin to Tokyo in 1931 as part of the type’s record-setting early career.
Junkers Aircraft · Junkers A50 Junior ↗Historical A50; not specifications for the modern aircraft
A modern aircraft with an older silhouette
Dieter Morszeck and his team developed a modern A50 Junior inspired by that earlier aircraft. The brochure pairs the corrugated-metal appearance with a fuel-injected Rotax engine, modern displays, Beringer brakes and a Galaxy rescue parachute. Those changes distinguish the modern Junior from both the 1929 aircraft and other later A50 versions.
Junkers Aircraft · Junkers A50 Junior brochure ↗Modern A50 Junior manufacturer brochure
Systems & details
The contemporary Junior’s specification
The modern manufacturer brochure describes an open, two-seat aircraft with a 100 PS Rotax engine, a 9.84-metre span and a 105-litre fuel capacity. Its quoted cruise is 155 km/h. These numbers belong to the contemporary A50 Junior recreation, whose propulsion and equipment differ from the 1929 aircraft. Keeping that scope visible lets the corrugated-metal appearance and historical inspiration be appreciated without attributing modern specifications to the original design.
In your simulator
Systems, equipment and documentation for each developer’s aircraft.
X-Plane 12A50 Junior (modern)
VSKYLABS · Released
A50 Junior (modern)
VSKYLABS · Released
Manuals & resources
Find your next read
Choose a topic for a short introduction and a link to the original source. Simulator references identify the developer and edition they cover.
Simulator documentation
The modern Rotax-powered JuniorA50 Junior (modern) · VSKYLABS · X-Plane 12
The product represents the modern Rotax-powered A50 Junior. Its G1000-based cockpit displays differ from the real aircraft’s G3X equipment, as the developer explains.
Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14
VSKYLABS · Read the source ↗Read the original documentation from the people who created it. Manuals open on their publisher’s website.
Developer documentation
VSKYLABS Aerospace Simulations Aircraft Center: VSKYLABS Junkers A50 JuniorVSKYLABS · Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14 VSKYLABS Junkers A50: Classic Tail-Dragger S-LSA for X-Plane.VSKYLABS · Official developer / designated-store reference · checked 2026-09-14Aircraft reference
Junkers A50 JuniorJunkers Aircraft · Reviewed public summary; original privately archived 2026-10-12 Junkers A50 Junior brochureJunkers Aircraft · Reviewed public summary; original privately archived 2026-10-12Built-in force-feedback profiles
Read the documentary basis, editable starting settings and remaining questions for the aircraft you fly. Each explanation refers to the exact profile revision shown.
Catalogue programme-20261022-v1 · 2 profile choices
VSKYLABS Junkers A50 Junior
VSKYLABS · Free and Pro · Revision 3 · Inherited starting point
X-Plane 12
VSKYLABS Junkers A50 Junior: Light manual controls motivate the selected reversible stick resistance.
Junkers A50 Junior (modern)
Free and Pro · Revision 1 · Partial review
X-Plane 12
Junkers A50 Junior (modern): Light manual controls motivate the selected reversible stick resistance.
Junkers A50 Junior (modern)
Junkers A50 Junior (modern): Light manual controls motivate the selected reversible stick resistance.
Aircraft and simulator scope
- Junkers A50 Junior (modern) · X-Plane 12 · family starting point
Junkers A50 Junior (modern) · VSKYLABS explicitly models the modern A50 Junior, version 1.1.1 for X-Plane 12, not the original 1929 aircraft.
The simulator model and controls
The modern A50 Junior revives the open tandem cockpits and corrugated-metal appearance of the 1929 Junkers design. It uses a Rotax 912iS engine and contemporary equipment. The developer's background records European ultralight approval in 2022, followed by US light sport approval.
This starting point selects Junkers A50 Junior (modern). Its aircraft-level settings do not select a particular developer’s custom systems.
How this profile feels
Light manual controls motivate the selected reversible stick resistance. Spring resistance builds with the selected airspeed response. A separate aerodynamic term adds speed-dependent control load.
Elevator trim is documented; its exact actuator and neutral relationship are not established. Valid trim provides the configured pressure relief. Autopilot following is off.
Controls and trim
The modern A50 uses a Rotax 912 iS and fixed tailwheel gear. Its checklist identifies elevator trim, while the simulator substitutes G1000 instruments for the real-aircraft display fit. This modern aircraft is a separately equipped development of the 1929 design.
About the values
The gains are normalized profile settings. They describe the chosen effect balance; hand force depends on the device and its output limits. IAS references are tuning values rather than operating limits. Physical acceptance of this revision remains pending.
What the documentation establishes
VSKYLABS explicitly models the modern A50 Junior, version 1.1.1 for X-Plane 12, not the original 1929 aircraft.
The modern aircraft has a Rotax 912iS, ballistic parachute and tailwheel layout; the original radial-engine installation is separately described.
The page quotes roughly 76 knots cruise, 46 knots stall and 112 knots recommended maximum, without clear IAS bases. The retained 90-knot reference is an estimate.
Documentary review and sources
These decisions describe the documentary basis and remaining gaps for this revision. Aircraft documentation and a starting setting describe different kinds of evidence.
Aircraft and variant
ReviewedThis starting point selects Junkers A50 Junior (modern). Its aircraft-level settings do not select a particular developer’s custom systems.
Flight controls
Not yet reviewedThe modern A50 uses a Rotax 912 iS and fixed tailwheel gear. Its checklist identifies elevator trim, while the simulator substitutes G1000 instruments for the real-aircraft display fit. This modern aircraft is a separately equipped development of the 1929 design.
Trim
Not yet reviewedElevator trim is documented; its exact actuator and neutral relationship are not established. Pitch authority 0.3 provides load relief and permitted centre movement; roll authority is 0.
Autopilot and stability
Not yet reviewedAutopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel.
Equipment
ReviewedGear, flap and ground cues follow the selected settings and available simulator-reported states.
Speeds and limits
ReviewedThe indicated-speed references set the profile response scale; they are separate from aircraft operating limits.
Simulator integration
Not yet reviewedThe profile targets xplane12. Add-on-specific controls use only the supported references configured by this profile.
Force-feedback settings
Not yet reviewedThe settings define the profile’s effect balance. Device output limits affect physical hand force.
Starting settings and their rationale
These configured values are starting estimates. The explanations describe what each setting controls; physical validation appears separately below.
| Setting | Starting value | What it controls and why |
|---|---|---|
| Spring strength | Starting value0.74 | What it controls and whyLight manual controls motivate the selected reversible stick resistance. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 45 KIAS. |
| Master force gain | Starting value0.85 | What it controls and whyScales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits. |
| Profile force gain | Starting value0.8 | What it controls and whyThe aerodynamic-load gain is 0.8 with an indicated-speed reference of 90 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring. |
| Force tuning speed/reference | Starting value90.0 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit. |
| Spring response reference speed | Starting value45.0 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it. |
| Aileron force scale | Starting value0.6 | What it controls and whyRoll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.6 and 0.78, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled. |
| Elevator force scale | Starting value0.78 | What it controls and whyScales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings. |
| Trim feel | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyRetained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement. |
| Trim relief | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount. |
| Autopilot follow | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyAutopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel. |
| Autopilot neutral hold | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyPermits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target. |
| Output force limit | Starting value0.55 | What it controls and whyCaps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate. |
All 44 starting settings and their rationale
The settings define the profile’s effect balance. Device output limits affect physical hand force.
| Setting | Starting value | What it controls and why |
|---|---|---|
| Spring strength | Starting value0.74 | What it controls and whyLight manual controls motivate the selected reversible stick resistance. The baseline spring is 0.74. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 45 KIAS. |
| Spring deadband | Starting value0.045 | What it controls and whySets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner. |
| Profile force gain | Starting value0.8 | What it controls and whyThe aerodynamic-load gain is 0.8 with an indicated-speed reference of 90 KIAS. This supplies speed-dependent loading alongside the spring. |
| Master force gain | Starting value0.85 | What it controls and whyScales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits. |
| QBlend Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it. |
| QSpring Minimum Factor | Starting value0.5 | What it controls and whySets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength. |
| QSpring Start Knots | Starting value12.6 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit. |
| Spring response reference speed | Starting value45.0 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it. |
| Force tuning speed/reference | Starting value90.0 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit. |
| Airspeed spring stiffening gain | Starting value0.15 | What it controls and whyThe high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0.15. It strengthens the permitted spring response above 45 KIAS, with the squared-speed ratio capped at 5. |
| Airspeed spring stiffening limit | Starting value5 | What it controls and whyLimits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap. |
| Aileron force scale | Starting value0.6 | What it controls and whyRoll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.6 and 0.78, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled. |
| Elevator force scale | Starting value0.78 | What it controls and whyScales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings. |
| Output force limit | Starting value0.55 | What it controls and whyCaps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate. |
| Trim feel | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyRetained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement. |
| Trim relief | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount. |
| Elevator Authority | Starting value0.3 | What it controls and whyElevator trim is documented; its exact actuator and neutral relationship are not established. Pitch authority 0.3 provides load relief and permitted centre movement; roll authority is 0. |
| Aileron Authority | Starting value0 | What it controls and whyScales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response. |
| Force Trim Enabled | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyEnables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification. |
| GLoad Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it. |
| Rate Damping Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law. |
| Autopilot follow | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyAutopilot following is off; the configured spring and load retain the hardware feel. |
| Autopilot follow authority | Starting value0.1 | What it controls and whySets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply. |
| Autopilot neutral hold | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyPermits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target. |
| Autopilot neutral hold strength | Starting value0.6 | What it controls and whySets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions. |
| Gain | Starting value0.35 | What it controls and whySets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings. |
| Gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whySets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate. |
| Gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whySets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate. |
| Maximum flap index | Starting value1 | What it controls and whySets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3. |
| Minimum flap index | Starting value1 | What it controls and whySets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees. |
| Gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whySets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate. |
| Shaker Enabled | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyPermits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment. |
| Stick shaker amplitude | Starting value0.5 | What it controls and whySets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry. |
| Gain | Starting value0.4 | What it controls and whySets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration. |
| Gain | Starting value0.25 | What it controls and whySets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact. |
| Gain | Starting value0.65 | What it controls and whySets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse. |
| Gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whySets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry. |
| Gain | Starting value0.12 | What it controls and whySets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement. |
| Gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whySets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue. |
| Gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whySets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects. |
Limits and open questions
- The product description does not explain primary control linkage or force gearing.
- Trim hardware or force relief is not described.
- G1000 avionics alone do not establish installed automatic-flight equipment in this edition.
- An assignment layer is described without exact published trim, autopilot or force-status signals.
- Authentic engine recordings and aerodynamic-model claims do not provide stick loads or vibration amplitudes.
- Junkers A50 Junior (modern) documentary evidence does not establish force-feedback hardware acceptance.
Physical validation
No physical force validation is recorded in this public catalogue for this revision. Documentary review and software checks do not establish how a particular device feels.
Discuss this aircraft (0)
Questions, observations and useful sources from the community.
No published discussions yet. Bring a question or share a useful source.
Open aircraft discussions →Content expanded · What’s new
Something missing or a source that needs attention?
Suggest a correction ↗
