Meet Lancair Legacy
The Legacy modernized Lancair's earlier 320 concept. It was offered as a kit, with retractable landing gear and a separate fixed-gear FG version. Those configurations carry different performance expectations even within the same family. The simulator catalogue identifies the Legacy RG, and the reference figures retain their source's configuration.
In your simulator
Systems, equipment and documentation for each developer’s aircraft.
Lancair Legacy
Aerobask
Aircraft · Released
| Product | Simulator | Product type |
|---|---|---|
| Lancair Legacy RG ↗Released | X-Plane 12 | Aircraft |
Aircraft specifications
Published figures for the named real-aircraft variant. Simulator equipment and performance can differ.
| Specification | Published value |
|---|---|
| Length | 22 ft 0 in (6.71 m) |
| Wingspan | 25 ft 6 in (7.77 m) |
| Wing area | 82.5 sq ft (7.66 m² ) |
| Empty weight | 1,500 lb (680 kg) |
| Gross weight | 2,200 lb (998 kg) |
| Powerplant | 1 × Continental IO-550-N six cylinder, four-stroke aircraft engine , 310 hp (230 kW) |
| Propellers | 3-bladed constant speed |
| Maximum speed | 295 mph (475 km/h, 256 kn) |
| Cruise speed | 276 mph (444 km/h, 240 kn) at 8000 feet |
| Stall speed | 65 mph (105 km/h, 56 kn) flaps down |
| Range | 1,150 mi (1,850 km, 1,000 nmi) at 8000 feet with reserves |
| Service ceiling | 18,000 ft (5,500 m) |
| Rate of climb | 2,000 ft/min (10 m/s) at gross weight |
In pictures
Photographs show the variants, related designs and historical examples identified in their captions.
Manuals & resources
Read the original documentation from the people who created it. Manuals open on their publisher’s website.
Aircraft background
Lancair LegacyWikipedia contributors · Research background · retrieved 2026-09-12Product
Lancair Legacy RGAerobask · Official developer / designated store catalogue · checked 2026-09-12Discuss this aircraft
Questions, observations and useful sources from the community.
Open aircraft discussions →Content expanded · What’s new
Something missing or a source that needs attention?
Suggest a correction ↗
