Start here
A few places to begin, from the aircraft’s story to the people who fly it.
Meet the aircraft
The Citation X is Cessna's Model 750, first flown in 1993. Its strongly swept wing and large rear-mounted engine nacelles set it apart from earlier Citations. The later X+ stretched the cabin and introduced further changes. The type is an interesting contrast with the smaller CJ family and the newer Longitude.
Aircraft background
Wikipedia contributors · Read more ↗Exploring the fast and slow ends of the X+
Gerzanics arrived with previous Citation X and Garmin experience, but the X+ still offered plenty to explore. During preparation, he liked the detailed airport map for taxiing while using a paper checklist with Pitcher. The flight then took him from high-altitude cruise through a fast descent and into low-speed airwork, exposing a much wider range than a simple transport trip.
Flight International · October 2014. Citation X+ preview with Textron demonstration pilot Alan Pitcher at Wichita; this is the later Garmin-equipped variant.
Flight International · Read more ↗Flight planning and radio management have separate interfaces
Laminar’s guide directs flight-plan work through the control display unit and refers to the separate X-Plane FMS manual for detailed operation. The radio management units provide communication, navigation and transponder controls, including active/standby frequencies and traffic-display selections. The illustrated cockpit uses these physical-key interfaces rather than the X+ touchscreen arrangement in some real-world accounts.
Cessna Citation X · Laminar Research · X-Plane 12
Laminar Research · Read more ↗Into the cockpit
YouTube KFEAvia · 22 min ·
CESSNA CITATION X BIZ JET FLIGHT
A Citation X flight between Frankfurt and Milan, including preparation and cockpit footage.
Real aircraft · Cessna Citation X
Watch on YouTube ↗Preview images are served by AirframeDB. Videos open on YouTube only when you choose to watch.
Meet Cessna Citation X
The Citation X is Cessna's Model 750, first flown in 1993. Its strongly swept wing and large rear-mounted engine nacelles set it apart from earlier Citations. The later X+ stretched the cabin and introduced further changes.
The X-Plane documentation describes its flight deck and powered control systems, which differ from those of the smaller CJ family and newer Longitude.
Cessna Citation
Cessna → · Explore the family →
Cessna Citation X
Wikipedia contributors · Cessna Citation X ↗Laminar Research · X-Plane 12 →Aircraft type designators
Use the code for the model you are flying. The linked authority lists the applicable aircraft.
History & design
The X+ updates a design built around speed
The later X+ combined updated engines and a Garmin G5000 flight deck with a revised cabin. Its autothrottles and touchscreen controllers changed the pilot’s working environment from the Honeywell-equipped original. Keeping the variant attached to a flight report matters when comparing its cockpit and handling with a simulator representation.
AOPA Pilot · The king of speed ↗AOPA Pilot · March 2015 · original X and later X+ distinctions
Development milestones
First flight: 21 December 1993
Developed from: Cessna Citation III
Wikipedia contributors · Cessna Citation X ↗Cessna Citation X · family/variant named by the source · Wikipedia revision 1373012343
Pilot accounts
Exploring the fast and slow ends of the X+
Gerzanics arrived with previous Citation X and Garmin experience, but the X+ still offered plenty to explore. During preparation, he liked the detailed airport map for taxiing while using a paper checklist with Pitcher. The flight then took him from high-altitude cruise through a fast descent and into low-speed airwork, exposing a much wider range than a simple transport trip.
He found the aircraft responsive during the descent and manageable in the slower exercises. Hand-flying the approach was comfortable, and he credited the landing gear with improving an imperfect touchdown. A later simulated engine failure after departure required considerable rudder effort before the aircraft was trimmed for the circuit. His report combines appreciation of the updated cockpit with the physical work still involved in flying the jet.
Flight International · October 2014. Citation X+ preview with Textron demonstration pilot Alan Pitcher at Wichita; this is the later Garmin-equipped variant.
Read the full account · Flight International ↗Eight flights make the country feel smaller
Sigari had four days and eight flights to become acquainted with the X+, beginning with a crossing from California to Rhode Island. The itinerary continued through several different airports and conditions before returning to California. What stayed with him was how quickly familiar distances passed: a machine he had long wanted to fly changed his sense of the size of the country.
The Garmin cockpit became comfortable fairly quickly, helped by his familiarity with related equipment. He found the powered controls predictable, but landing introduced habits that took a few attempts to absorb, especially getting the nose down after touchdown. The long trip also gave him time to appreciate the revised cabin. His enthusiasm comes from repeated use over several days in the X+ and its particular cockpit, rather than the earlier Citation X.
AOPA Pilot · March 2015. Eight Citation X+ legs over four days, including a Santa Barbara–Newport crossing and visits to Santa Fe and Aspen.
Read the full account · AOPA Pilot ↗An introductory flight interrupted by a warning
North first used a simulator to become familiar with the Citation X’s Honeywell displays, then flew the aircraft itself. He liked the visibility in the landing pattern and found other traffic easy to pick out. The introduction changed direction when a low-hydraulic-quantity warning appeared, prompting demonstration pilot James Lapine to return to the Cessna facility at Wichita.
In the publisher’s retrospective, North recalls mild turbulence on the return, which he felt was not strongly transmitted through the wing into the cabin, and prompt engine response in the pattern. Another flight was arranged with Lee Herman. The accessible account covers this interrupted introduction; it does not describe the outcome of the later flight.
Aviation Week’s March 2022 retrospective of North’s September 1996 Citation X report. This account uses the publisher’s public retrospective and quoted passages.
Read the full account · Aviation Week ↗In your simulator
Systems, equipment and documentation for each developer’s aircraft.
Compare simulator versions →X-Plane 12Cessna Citation X
Laminar Research · Released
Cessna Citation X
Laminar Research · Released
MSFS 2020 · MSFS 2024Citation X
FlightFX · Released
Citation X
FlightFX · Released
Manuals & resources
Find your next read
Choose a topic for a short introduction and a link to the original source. Simulator references identify the developer and edition they cover.
Simulator documentation
Flight planning and radio management have separate interfacesCessna Citation X · Laminar Research · X-Plane 12
Laminar’s guide directs flight-plan work through the control display unit and refers to the separate X-Plane FMS manual for detailed operation. The radio management units provide communication, navigation and transponder controls, including active/standby frequencies and traffic-display selections. The illustrated cockpit uses these physical-key interfaces rather than the X+ touchscreen arrangement in some real-world accounts.
Laminar Citation X guide · PDF pp.38–40
Laminar Research · Read the source ↗Powered controls and spoiler roll assistanceCessna Citation X · Laminar Research · X-Plane 12
Laminar's Citation X overview describes powered flight controls and the spoilers' contribution to roll control. The simulator setup section supplies electric stabiliser-trim commands.
Laminar CitationX guide · PDF pp.5,17,19
Laminar Research · Read the source ↗Pilot account
Exploring the fast and slow ends of the X+Flight International · October 2014. Citation X+ preview with Textron demonstration pilot Alan Pitcher at Wichita; this is the later Garmin-equipped variant.
Gerzanics arrived with previous Citation X and Garmin experience, but the X+ still offered plenty to explore. During preparation, he liked the detailed airport map for taxiing while using a paper checklist with Pitcher. The flight then took him from high-altitude cruise through a fast descent and into low-speed airwork, exposing a much wider range than a simple transport trip. He found the aircraft responsive during the descent and manageable in the slower exercises.
Mike Gerzanics
Flight International · Read the source ↗Eight flights make the country feel smallerAOPA Pilot · March 2015. Eight Citation X+ legs over four days, including a Santa Barbara–Newport crossing and visits to Santa Fe and Aspen.
Sigari had four days and eight flights to become acquainted with the X+, beginning with a crossing from California to Rhode Island. The itinerary continued through several different airports and conditions before returning to California. What stayed with him was how quickly familiar distances passed: a machine he had long wanted to fly changed his sense of the size of the country. The Garmin cockpit became comfortable fairly quickly, helped by his familiarity with related equipment.
Cyrus Sigari
AOPA Pilot · Read the source ↗Developer documentation
Citation X — product listingCitation X · MSFS 2020 · MSFS 2024
Product listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogue
FlightFX · Read the source ↗Read the original documentation from the people who created it. Manuals open on their publisher’s website.
Manual
Cessna Citation X POHLaminar Research X-Plane 12 Desktop ManualLaminar Research X-Plane aircraft and avionics manualsLaminar ResearchAircraft background
Cessna Citation XWikipedia contributors · Research background · Wikipedia revision 1373012343 · retrieved 2026-09-12Type designator
ICAO Doc 8643 — aircraft type designatorsInternational Civil Aviation Organization · Public search data retrieved 2026-09-14; authority update 2026-09-03Product
Citation XFlightFX · Product listing captured 2026-09-24; edition scope from the reviewed catalogueBuilt-in force-feedback profiles
Read the documentary basis, editable starting settings and remaining questions for the aircraft you fly. Each explanation refers to the exact profile revision shown.
Catalogue programme-20261022-v1 · 2 profile choices
FlightFX Citation X
FlightFX · Free and Pro · Revision 3 · Inherited starting point
MSFS 2020 · MSFS 2024
FlightFX Citation X: Hydraulic primary controls motivate an artificial-feel approximation; direct aerodynamic surface loading is not presumed at the yoke.
Cessna Citation X
Free and Pro · Revision 2 · Partial review
X-Plane 12
Cessna Citation X: Hydraulic primary controls motivate an artificial-feel approximation; direct aerodynamic surface loading is not presumed at the yoke.
Cessna Citation X
Cessna Citation X: Hydraulic primary controls motivate an artificial-feel approximation; direct aerodynamic surface loading is not presumed at the yoke.
Aircraft and simulator scope
- Cessna Citation X · X-Plane 12 · family starting point
Laminar Citation X pilot guide, preserved URL version dated February 9, 2024; physical feel calibration is not supplied. · Selected choice: Cessna Citation X. Documentary scope does not establish every variant, add-on revision or simulator binding.
The simulator model and controls
The Citation X is Cessna's Model 750, first flown in 1993. Its strongly swept wing and large rear-mounted engine nacelles set it apart from earlier Citations. The later X+ stretched the cabin and introduced further changes.
This starting point selects Cessna Citation X. Its aircraft-level settings do not select a particular developer’s custom systems.
How this profile feels
Spring resistance builds with the selected airspeed response. A separate aerodynamic term adds speed-dependent control load.
Valid trim provides the configured pressure relief. Autopilot following is enabled for supported control references.
Controls and trim
FlightFX's Citation X guide explicitly identifies hydraulic primary controls and separates the pitch-trim wheel input from an autopilot movement target. The original MSFS 2020/2024 product and native MSFS 2024 V2 are different software generations. The guide's download label says v1.2 while its footer says v1.1, revised 2025-08-29; that version ambiguity is retained rather than assumed away.
About the values
The gains are normalized profile settings. They describe the chosen effect balance; hand force depends on the device and its output limits. IAS references are tuning values rather than operating limits. Physical acceptance of this revision remains pending.
What the documentation establishes
The pilot guide identifies electric pitch-trim controls for its Citation X implementation.
Electric pitch trim and rudder-trim tabs are documented; the preset's trim authority remains a numerical approximation.
Pitch/roll control disconnect behavior is described; this feature is separate from ordinary spring and aerodynamic cues.
Documentary review and sources
These decisions describe the documentary basis and remaining gaps for this revision. Aircraft documentation and a starting setting describe different kinds of evidence.
Aircraft and variant
ReviewedThis starting point selects Cessna Citation X. Its aircraft-level settings do not select a particular developer’s custom systems.
Flight controls
Not yet reviewedFlightFX's Citation X guide explicitly identifies hydraulic primary controls and separates the pitch-trim wheel input from an autopilot movement target. The original MSFS 2020/2024 product and native MSFS 2024 V2 are different software generations. The guide's download label says v1.2 while its footer says v1.1, revised 2025-08-29; that version ambiguity is retained rather than assumed away.
Trim
ReviewedElectric pitch trim is documented, but wheel input is distinct from an autopilot target and the profile authority remains estimated. Pitch authority 0.3 relieves permitted loading; hydraulic centre movement is off. Roll authority is 0.09.
Autopilot and stability
Not yet reviewedFollowing is on at 0.1 authority when a supported, valid autopilot control reference is available.
Equipment
ReviewedGear, flap and ground cues follow the selected settings and available simulator-reported states.
Speeds and limits
Not yet reviewedThe indicated-speed references set the profile response scale; they are separate from aircraft operating limits.
Simulator integration
Not yet reviewedThe profile targets xplane12. Add-on-specific controls use only the supported references configured by this profile.
Force-feedback settings
Not yet reviewedThe settings define the profile’s effect balance. Device output limits affect physical hand force.
Starting settings and their rationale
These configured values are starting estimates. The explanations describe what each setting controls; physical validation appears separately below.
| Setting | Starting value | What it controls and why |
|---|---|---|
| Spring strength | Starting value0.8 | What it controls and whyHydraulic primary controls motivate an artificial-feel approximation; direct aerodynamic surface loading is not presumed at the yoke. The baseline spring is 0.8. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 90 KIAS. |
| Master force gain | Starting value0.85 | What it controls and whyScales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits. |
| Profile force gain | Starting value0.25 | What it controls and whyThe aerodynamic-load gain is 0.25 with an indicated-speed reference of 280 KIAS. The hydraulic-load factor of 0.35 scales that modeled term; it is a selected artificial-feel approximation. |
| Force tuning speed/reference | Starting value280.0 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit. |
| Spring response reference speed | Starting value90 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it. |
| Aileron force scale | Starting value0.65 | What it controls and whyRoll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled. |
| Elevator force scale | Starting value0.65 | What it controls and whyScales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings. |
| Trim feel | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyRetained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement. |
| Trim relief | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount. |
| Autopilot follow | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyFollowing is on at 0.1 authority when a supported, valid autopilot control reference is available. |
| Autopilot neutral hold | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyPermits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target. |
| Output force limit | Starting value0.55 | What it controls and whyCaps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate. |
All 44 starting settings and their rationale
The settings define the profile’s effect balance. Device output limits affect physical hand force.
| Setting | Starting value | What it controls and why |
|---|---|---|
| Spring strength | Starting value0.8 | What it controls and whyHydraulic primary controls motivate an artificial-feel approximation; direct aerodynamic surface loading is not presumed at the yoke. The baseline spring is 0.8. Its low-speed blend reaches baseline strength at 90 KIAS. |
| Spring deadband | Starting value0.035 | What it controls and whySets travel around the centre before the baseline spring resists. Smaller values engage it sooner. |
| Profile force gain | Starting value0.25 | What it controls and whyThe aerodynamic-load gain is 0.25 with an indicated-speed reference of 280 KIAS. The hydraulic-load factor of 0.35 scales that modeled term; it is a selected artificial-feel approximation. |
| Master force gain | Starting value0.85 | What it controls and whyScales overall profile strength while preserving effect balance, subject to device and output limits. |
| QBlend Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows baseline spring strength to rise with indicated airspeed where the control law permits it. |
| QSpring Minimum Factor | Starting value0.55 | What it controls and whySets low-speed spring strength as a fraction of baseline when blending is enabled. One keeps full strength. |
| QSpring Start Knots | Starting value20 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS where the low-speed spring blend starts rising. This is a feel threshold, not a flight limit. |
| Spring response reference speed | Starting value90 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS where the low-speed blend reaches baseline strength; high-speed stiffening also uses it. |
| Force tuning speed/reference | Starting value280.0 kt | What it controls and whySets the IAS reference for aerodynamic loading. It is an estimate, not published cruise TAS or a flight limit. |
| Airspeed spring stiffening gain | Starting value0 | What it controls and whyThe high-speed spring-stiffening gain is 0. No additional speed-driven stiffening is added; this does not disable independent aerodynamic loading. |
| Airspeed spring stiffening limit | Starting value5 | What it controls and whyLimits the squared airspeed ratio used for high-speed spring stiffening; it is not a device-force cap. |
| Aileron force scale | Starting value0.65 | What it controls and whyRoll and pitch aerodynamic scales are 0.65 and 0.65, respectively. They set the aerodynamic axis balance. No custom spring-travel curve is enabled. |
| Elevator force scale | Starting value0.65 | What it controls and whyScales pitch aerodynamic loading; pitch spring travel and trim responses are separate settings. |
| Output force limit | Starting value0.55 | What it controls and whyCaps directed-force output. Native spring effects and device limits remain separate. |
| Trim feel | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyRetained for compatibility and group membership. Trim relief, rather than this flag, controls centre movement. |
| Trim relief | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows trim relief with supported control law and valid telemetry. Axis authorities set its amount. |
| Elevator Authority | Starting value0.3 | What it controls and whyElectric pitch trim is documented, but wheel input is distinct from an autopilot target and the profile authority remains estimated. Pitch authority 0.3 relieves permitted loading; hydraulic centre movement is off. Roll authority is 0.09. |
| Aileron Authority | Starting value0.09 | What it controls and whyScales supported roll-trim relief and permitted centre movement. Zero removes roll response. |
| Force Trim Enabled | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyEnables local force trim, separate from aircraft-owned trim and add-on integration qualification. |
| GLoad Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyAllows load-factor changes to modify permitted spring laws. Passive fly-by-wire feel can suppress it. |
| Rate Damping Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables rate damping with the configured coefficients and control law. |
| Autopilot follow | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyFollowing is on at 0.1 authority when a supported, valid autopilot control reference is available. |
| Autopilot follow authority | Starting value0.1 | What it controls and whySets admitted AP-follow gain, not a percentage of travel. Runtime ownership and input limits still apply. |
| Autopilot neutral hold | Starting valueDisabled | What it controls and whyPermits centering hold during a supported AP state, separate from following a moving target. |
| Autopilot neutral hold strength | Starting value0.6 | What it controls and whySets admitted AP neutral-hold strength; inactive while neutral hold is disabled. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables aerodynamic cues; each still needs nonzero strength and its simulator conditions. |
| Gain | Starting value0.3 | What it controls and whySets stall-buffet strength. Zero removes the cue without changing simulator stalls or warnings. |
| Gain | Starting value0.22 | What it controls and whySets high-Mach buffet strength; onset and full-strength thresholds are separate. |
| Gain | Starting value0.14 | What it controls and whySets flap buffet at the configured position and speed gates. Flap movement texture is separate. |
| Maximum flap index | Starting value3 | What it controls and whySets the final flap index for detent normalization. UP plus three detents uses maximum index3. |
| Minimum flap index | Starting value2 | What it controls and whySets the first flap detent that admits buffet; this is a handle index, not degrees. |
| Gain | Starting value0.1 | What it controls and whySets gear aerodynamic buffet; movement and ground-contact cues are separate. |
| Shaker Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyPermits shaker at supported warning conditions; the switch does not establish aircraft equipment. |
| Stick shaker amplitude | Starting value0.9 | What it controls and whySets triggered shaker strength; inactive while the shaker feature is disabled. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables ground effects; each still needs its own strength and contact or motion telemetry. |
| Gain | Starting value0.4 | What it controls and whySets rolling texture strength, modified by speed, surface and undercarriage configuration. |
| Gain | Starting value0.32 | What it controls and whySets gear-bump texture during ground motion, separate from touchdown impact. |
| Gain | Starting value0.9 | What it controls and whySets landing-impact strength; landing telemetry and response shape determine the pulse. |
| Gain | Starting value0.5 | What it controls and whySets reverse-thrust vibration with valid reverser and engine conditions. Zero removes the cue. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables engine cues with nonzero settings and valid running-engine telemetry. |
| Gain | Starting value0.06 | What it controls and whySets estimated engine vibration using configured telemetry and response, not measured cockpit vibration. |
| Enabled | Starting valueEnabled | What it controls and whyEnables accessory cues with configured strengths and observed accessory movement. |
| Gain | Starting value0.12 | What it controls and whySets texture from observed flap movement; a command without movement does not establish the cue. |
| Gain | Starting value0.12 | What it controls and whySets texture from observed gear movement, separate from aerodynamic and touchdown effects. |
Limits and open questions
- Rudder-trim tabs and pitch/roll disconnect descriptions do not establish the complete artificial-feel mechanism.
- The disconnect-system description does not establish external autopilot servo telemetry.
- Electric-trim controls do not derive the selected indicated-speed force reference.
- Cockpit procedures and disconnect descriptions do not publish force-output or controller-ownership semantics.
- Trim/disconnect behavior does not calibrate the preset's Q-feel approximation, spring strength or axis ratio.
Physical validation
No physical force validation is recorded in this public catalogue for this revision. Documentary review and software checks do not establish how a particular device feels.
Discuss this aircraft (0)
Questions, observations and useful sources from the community.
No published discussions yet. Bring a question or share a useful source.
Open aircraft discussions →Content expanded · What’s new
Something missing or a source that needs attention?
Suggest a correction ↗
